Re: [ET2] Intro & Prosperity

Hello ! Silvia!

Thanks for the nice post! Really funny, I too can get possessed by
Richard and Milton, which is a tracne induction by itself for people
watching!

I take it all in! I know what to do next.

Next time, I'll write shorter posts for you ;)

Alex

--- In emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com, "StarFields" <starfields_at_b...>
wrote:
>
>
> > Just bought the ET e-book
>
> Cool - LOL!
> !
> >
> > I have to say, nice pre-framing at the beginning. I
> > have trouble even
> > wanting to learn the old maps for the energy body,
> > whereas before
> > reading it, I was ready to take a training on exactly
> > that. Reminds
> > me of the first time I trained with Bandler, my reality
> > switched...
>
> I trained very very heavily with Bandler. Heck, I *am* Bandler, in
> parts ;-> I would go further and absolutely say that without Dr
> Bandler, none of us would be here at all or doing what we are with
> these new techniques. My "reality" also switched. From on-off to
> multilevel dimmer, at that!
>
> Hail Richard Bandler (and Count Alfred Korzybski!)
>
>
> >
> > I'll experiment with ET with a friend today so that I can give
> > feedback tomorrow.
>
> Nice. That's the spirit!
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hahaha! Yeah! I clearly and more clearly still
> > remember the moment
> > > I decided to never again give a MET prac - I was
> > standing in the
> > > hall in Bexhill in front of this whiteboard, writing
> > TFT on the
> > > board for the "history of Meridian Therapies" section
> > and thought,
> > > that is IT. I will *never* put myself through this again.
> > >
> > > It was quite fun, really. It was so absolutely
> > overwhelming that
> > > it overrode all due financial considerations; so I dropped
> > > teaching METs and concentrated on my own research instead.
> >
> > I said to myself some time ago, I won't do another
> > sales training
> > unless it's just the title of the training and I teach
> > whatever I
> > want which will help the trainees to sell and improve
> > the rest of
> > their lives at the same time. Corporations usually
> > don't like that in
> > Quebec. They want to see a detailed step by step plan of the
> > training...
>
> Well ... she said in a long drawn out drawl as she became Mr
> Bandler again ... you could always lie. A detailed, step by step
> lie of what isn't in that training at all as you wouldn't know
> unless you were there; and even if you were, you might still think
> its a sales training but Milton, he could talk to three people and
> one would think he was talking about a snake, another about a
> garden hose and the third would be convinced he'd heard a story
> that changed his life.
>
> <brrrr! Shakes herself out of brief possession and turns back into
> being Silvia ;->
>
>
>
> > > Ok! "Just my beliefs" or the rules of the world of your own
> > > personal constructs. In some fantasy worlds, vampires
> > can fly and
> > > in others they can't. In some construct worlds, you CAN find
> > > people for wildly esoteric trainings and have a ball - and in
> > > some, you can't.
> >
> > When you say some construct worlds, do you mean the one
> > in my mind
> > (beliefs and all) or (and if you want to) the shared reality
> > somewhere. Construct of a group? My construct?
>
> Well, each individual makes a construct. They're all different.
> Hence the old Mormon joke of the preacher saying to his wife, "The
> whole village is possessed by the devil, apart from thee and me.
> And I'm not sure about thee ..."
>
> Groups of constructs get together and make meta-constructs, agree
> the rules and try to live by them but as they're all different
> anyway, there will be various degrees of success. And pain. Of
> course.
>
> This is pure General Semantics. If you wish to interact with the
> meta-construct, you use the terms/labels/languaging OF the
> meta-construct. So if you're selling to the German government just
> before the 2nd World war, you'd be talking about the Fatherland,
> racial purity, the need for more land, cleansing the World,
> brotherhood of all Arians and all the various meta-labels they
> have agreed on to use in their meta-construct.
>
> Whoa. How did we get into that on ET2? but anyway, that's about
> it. Meta-phors for meta-constructs. They all have them. Know them,
> feed them back and they'll love ya. It's a construct thing ... ;->
>
>
> >> I think I'll have to do ET on that. I can imagine
> > myself visiting a
> > new house, run my hands around and do ET and then go
> > back to my small
> > appartment with other people to split the cost.
> >
> > I'm kidding by the way! ;)
>
> Yeah actually, you shouldn't be. Do it for real and experience
> what happens. Heard of the good old adage, "Wherever you go, there
> you are?" It's true!
>
> Indeed, I do believe I am one of a pair of veritable EXPERTS on
> the topic of houses and whether or not they contribute to your
> quest for enlightenment - LOL.
>
> Perhaps the other in the pair would like to make some comments on
> the topic! <nudge nudge, wink wink!>
>
>
> waves,
>
> SF

           
Received on Fri Jun 06 2003 - 07:34:40 BST