Hi Gabriella
The cognitive folks say that cognition (beliefs) determine affects. And as Brian already mentioned, they got it largely the wrong way around. (He could also have cited LeDoux, BTW).
And most "you create your own reality people" believe in changing the *content* of beliefs, instead of the *charge* of the beliefs, or the energetic component, using an IMO hyped up and oversimplified version of cognitive psychology.
Saying that "we create our emotions" and thus our reality may be partly true, but then too the inverse ("our affects create us").
So how about: to some extent we create parts of our reality, but on the other (larger?) hand, *reality creates us*?
Long live the approaches that target energy and emotion, and this the *charge* of beliefs, instead of the content of beliefs!
Maarten
----- Original Message -----
From: Gabrielle Kortsch
To: emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:44 PM
Subject: RE: [ET2] Easy?
Maarten:
If I understand the "you create your own reality" folks correctly, they
place emphasis <precisely> on the fact that beliefs MUST have affect
(emotional charge) associated with them in order to have any kind of
impact (e.g., Abraham Hicks). Even my (just about completed :-) )
academically anaesthetized doctoral dissertation (life course theory,
grounded theory, integrated qualitative - data analytic strategies) that
deals with intervention impact on qualitative change (in particular at
major life transitions and turning points) and positive youth
development for at risk youth and recidivist juvenile delinquents is
based on an intervention that attempts to bring about the sought-after
change in these kids (as compared to controls), recognizes that these
young people are indeed creating their own reality by the force of the
affect in their belief in their future selves, whatever these may be. In
order to change, therefore, in a positive direction, a belief in a
different future (e.g., become a doctor vs. become a drug dealer, or
believe in the innate goodness of man vs. the opposite) is only
effective if the affect involved suffuses the person with strong
feeling.
Gabrielle
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Mon Feb 10 2003 - 14:42:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT