>
> You kinda beat me to the question R.D. The thing is
> theres newbys and there
> are newbies. New to ET and ignorant of "Energy
> Psychology" and there are
> those who are pretty savy about energy but new to ET.
> I fall in the former
> category and although your new book (to me an absolute
> stunner) will keep me
> occupied for the short term I've already started
> compiling questions about
> energy theory etc. Any possibility of starting a group
> for "real" newbys,
> maybe call it ET2Newbies?
>
> warmly,
> WF
>
>>
WF, we must endeavour to keep in mind that the two people with the
longest serving experience in EmoTrance have probably a seniority
of 6 months max over the rest of anyone else at this point.
If you were to look at it like that, this IS the newbies group.
As long as its an EmoTrance question and not a strange
hallucination based on ideas what ET might be but isn't, it is
totally welcome here - from MET newbies just as well as from MET
oldbies.
All the METs are brand new compared to just about everything else
and all of it is massively in flux and under constant development.
So if you've read the manual or you've had a session with a
practitioner, just ask away.
If there are any hesitations to asking, then please ask yourself
where you feel that in your body. If the cognition shift hasnt
made the question immaterial or indeed answered it already, ask
the question; else share the cognition!
Lets have some discussion, communication about this. I want to
learn something new on this list!!!!
SF
Received on Sun Feb 02 2003 - 15:59:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT