Re: [ET2] ET & Newbies Questions

From: wfmb <wfmb_at_N25-Q-u4aBByTcDTwqX3BYZYIh2cgM_f6fdlRo7hGZdedVZiA7WjCS8A5YaM77rQQLFaYxUBk8>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 15:55:35 -0800

----- Original Message -----
From: StarFields <starfields_at_e7FX5BldQsmR7T_N-Fdn0pgMOoe8gPL-85j91kCYBN9s3ll5yCQG_axSqJB3_YRgPKdZTcMLjyCcbWwmHL2ea_s.yahoo.invalid>
To: <emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: [ET2] ET & Newbies Questions

You kinda beat me to the question R.D. The thing is theres newbys and there
are newbies. New to ET and ignorant of "Energy Psychology" and there are
those who are pretty savy about energy but new to ET. I fall in the former
category and although your new book (to me an absolute stunner) will keep me
occupied for the short term I've already started compiling questions about
energy theory etc. Any possibility of starting a group for "real" newbys,
maybe call it ET2Newbies?

warmly,
WF

> > So the question
> > really is -is
> > the voice of the novice expected and welcomed here?
> >
> > RD
> >
>
> Yes absolutely with one single proviso.
>
> The questions MUST be based on some form of familiarity with the
> ideas and the protocols, from the book, from a training, from
> having done personal work with a practitioner or from having
> played with it with other people who actually *know* the
> protocols.
>
> Otherwise, questions become nonsensical and unanswerable in all
> ways.
> .

           
Received on Sun Feb 02 2003 - 15:51:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT