RE: [ET2] NLP and Emotrance

From: Johan Roelofse <hunashaman_at_ERfQtJsA5mqUGgaYxEpUEWPNFM9tJ-0gPhS6iUe-Rre9foYcRmdJm6s3wD-jIYuRMJls>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:43:16 +0200

Hi Carol

 

It very much depends on how NLP is used. Some of the NLP methods are very
visually oriented and make use of association and dissociation, for example.
Some of the newer NLP patterns and methodologies work a lot with body
sensations (the so-called) kinaesthetic modality. Richard Bandler (among
others) make a lot of use of energy work in the way they use NLP. Ultimately
NLP should not be seen as a bunch of techniques. The important thing is to
do what works for you.

 

Regards

 

Johan

 

From: emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of carolveronicafinch
Sent: 01 December 2007 21:31
To: emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ET2] NLP and Emotrance

 

Hi everyone,
As Emotrance followed work in NLP etc, I was hoping that someone could
help me. I have been a big fan of Emotrance for some time now, even
though I feel I don't do it very well. I have just been on a course
to help cure a medical condition which uses a lot of NLP. I am
thoroughly confused now though because the course ignores the physical
sensations and endeavours to get one to change state to a positive
one, by using either memories of old or pretend future states. I just
can't reconcile the two now, as emotrance is surely about being in the
moment, and being in the body. I really hope someone can help me see
if I have confused something, as I am about to reject the course but
really want its benefits!

Thanks in anticipation,
Carol

 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

           
Received on Sun Dec 02 2007 - 06:47:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT