Re: [ET2] maybe off topic/ PS

I didn't switch for this one.

You know about my weird PS... I'l observe some more and see what's
happening. Now my question is: "How do I know it's time to move on
and do the other things in the book?"

I experience it a bit like imagestreaming. And with IS, got very good
at it (maybe that's why it was easy for me to have this kind of PS),
but had trouble getting useful solutions. Maybe one in four or one in
five attemps. The rest seemed like psychedelic something. A fun
experience, but to me it was like when you say ET without the
nergised state is like sex without the orgasm (I think).

Thanks for your patience!

Multi-question Magickman

> Yeah well, PS is my attempt to breach the divide. Which, whilst
> I'm on the subject, is fascinating because I have a very good
> friend who has been trying to do it for YEARS from the other side,
> namely via lucid dreaming and OBE.
>
> He's good at it but lucid dreaming is SO MUCH HARDER to learn than
> PS is, its unbelievable! And, I dare say (although he may not
> agree <g>)that you have a lot more control and options with PS
> than you do with lucid dreaming, once you learn a few lessons
> about how incredibly restrictive hard thinking is in those kinds
> of realms.
>
> PS is a very good device to learn systems thinking on a whole new
> level and in my opinion, that's essential to think beyond and into
> the non-construct realms.
>
> As to the foetus - well you know and I know that's just a
> construct! I think you'll be just fine. We've got a very set of
> tools and toys to play with here, and better ones will emerge as
> we go along (heck, they're doing so at the rate of knots!).
>
> This is not going to take as long as anyone here might anticipate.
>
> And, as someone said the other day, it doesn't matter to take a
> bit of time. Five minutes as an actualised human being just wipes
> away 85 years of construct-nothing and nowhere in an instant and
> its worth it.
>
> :-)
>
> SF
>
>
> PS. You personally might like to know that I consider the totality
> of consciousness (i.e. all conscious thought plus all unconscious
> processes which are only thus because the construct has surpressed
> them there!) as a MAJOR player and MAJOR part of the human
> totality and absolutely necessary for the actualisation process
> and result. Which is somewhat unusual in the maps we've had
> presented so far.
>
>
>
>
> ==============================

           
Received on Tue Jun 10 2003 - 08:06:08 BST