Re: [ET2] Actualisation Priority (was Intro & Prosperity)

From: <Timitisi_at_9AkvmL6_no9WM_O7nnVlkDsRa4YBV53qohTG1c43m5AJZOr_UpR9WeLjw-SjkPDT2qeYoF>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:36:06 EDT

>All and every "hope and dream" any of us had up until now are
*construct* hopes and dreams.

>Constructs do NOT have a heart and they do NOT have a soul and
that is the total reality for consciousness when it is INSIDE THE
CONSTRUCT.

>So what's a construct to do?????

>It has to try and do certain things which are SAID to be the cure
for the construct's diseases. Such as finding THE ONE soul mate
(ha! rather than YOUR OWN SOUL!) and then you can love and you
know you are loved and you'll be happy and the pain will stop.

>Now, I have watched folk doing this and it is all an illusion. It
seems real to the constructs, and it is very hard on them, on us,
because the very resources that are needed to make "life on Earth"
actually work are not within the construct, but outside of it.

>So, people who want to overcome their fear of public speaking, why
are they doing this? Ask them. So they earn more money, get a
better house, find a prettier woman with which to make lots of
Walton children and live happily ever after. Or, because if lots
of people buy their products and clap like mad they will finally
know they are worth something and the pain will stop. Or - etc.

>For at least ten years I have been totally convinced that there is
NO such thing as unconscious resistance, or self sabotage.

>That the totality is ALWAYS totally loving and really does have
our best interest at heart.

>That the constructs we've made and which include ALL our hopes and
>dreams are NOT functioning because THEY ARE BASICALLY WORTHLESS
>AND NOT WORTH HAVING and that persuing them is a waste of this
>incarnation, which is once and once only and will NEVER be again.

Is this what they call constructive criticism?
Is it a construct's construct of what it imagines a construct to be?
Maybe it's a constructs attempt to instruct itself?
Maybe it's a constructs attempt to self-destruct?
I think one of these constructs is running amokt!
Tim

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

           
Received on Thu Jun 05 2003 - 13:36:32 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT