Re: [ET2] Dear Anti-Christ

Are we having fun, yet?

Personally, I don't find exchanges like this to be useful, helpful, or
enjoyable. In fact, I find exchanges like this to be annoying; I didn't
think that this kind of arguing would happen on a list like this, and
that is, for me, a disappointment.

Of course, this is just my own opinion...feedback, as it were!

Oops! I forgot to apply Emotrance to this...please excuse me while I
pause to do that....

Excuse me...doc...it's FUN (for me, now, anyway) to apply a sharp
intellect this way!! (I still don't like the results, much...but then,
that's just a choice - how I percieve the energy. Gotta do some more
processing.) Another pause....

Ahh...it IS just energy! Continue away, doc...this IS fun, and lots of
energy to enjoy, too.

My thanks to Silvia for the ET approach which helped me transform my
experience of this situation, and to doc for providing lots of energy,
fun, and also (in some of his professional work) other useful tools for
helping me appreciate and experience this situation differently.

I am amazed at how easy it is for me to forget to apply what I've been
learning about, and how wonderful and useful it is when I DO happen to
remember! I sure hope I remember this, even more, and more, and more....

Thanks....
-David Burnet

On Fri, 30 May 2003 00:08:34 -0500, "docresults" <Dr.Houston_at_IIHCSujjbC8sss0KhFh2itDEu0gDBAT4ELQg2DVfP21yU1XQwgLUNjBqJIR7XF2Z5.yahoo.invalid>
said:
> This message only has an HTML part -- this is a text generated
> representation
>
>
> At 08:22 PM 5/29/2003 -0500, Silvia wrote:
> >>Yes. Absolutely. I wasn't going to admit to it in public, but I am
> >>in fact the coming of the Anti-Christ, and I am here to make sure
> >>that the next 12,000 years are going to be *exactly* as fucked up
> >>and useless as the last 12,000 were!
> >>
> >>Read the Thought Flow series on Sidereus. Especially the one
> >>called, The Totality.
> >>Then lets talk.
> Dear Anti-Christ (Silvia),
> I reread the Thought Flow series including The Totality. (It sure is
> funny
> how when I read what you wrote I think it is saying the same thing I
> was/am
> saying and yet I thought you wanted me to read it to understand your
> POV
> which you indicate is different.)
> Oh the ambiguity of words, you gotta love'em.
> Help me out here. If I misunderstand correctly your premise is that we
> need
> to treat the totality (soul/energy/T-M/physical[mind-body-soul-energy]
> whatever) with respect? or equally?... Which one?
> If I'm missunderstanding correctly you have determined a model/order
> or
> hierarchy, right? Is it totality = soul system ->energy system -> T-M
> system -> physical system or is it soul system ->energy system ->
> physical
> system -> T-M system?
> The -> indicates the direction of influence.
> While I may be off or missing the mark here (that would mean I'm
> sinning) I
> think this is close to what you had in mind based on adding the
> Thought
> Flow series with what you wrote before.
> While I prefer a more holographic model where in the totality all the
> systems are connected to and influence each other and can communicate
> in
> all directions at the same time, it seems to me from your previous
> email on
> the subject you have the influence only going one way ->.
> I think you have mentioned and/or indicated that the higher system can
> get
> feedback from the lower system but are not able to initiate change in
> a
> higher system, in other words it can't influence up the chain except
> by
> feedback and it can influence down the chain without feedback. Is this
> close.
> And based on your concept of "saving the totality" wouldn't totality
> be
> better served if both influence and feedback were able to be
> communicated
> <-> both ways. (That seems more ecological to me, but I could be
> missing
> something here)
> I think, and it's just me, that saying the influence is only one
> directional, except in the form of feedback is limiting the Totality.
> I have other thoughts and questions on different aspects of the
> Totality
> and the Totality itself but those take the brainstorming session in
> another
> direction, so I'll save them for later.
> Need Nothing, Desire Everything, Choose What Shows Up,
> Enjoy Life-It's ALL Information, Utilize It ALL,
> Doc

           
Received on Fri May 30 2003 - 05:35:39 BST