RE: [ET2] Think ENERGY

>
> >
> > Why is cause and effect only one way? From energy body
> > -> to T-M. In my
> > model it is both ways energy body <-> T-M system.
> > Doesn't this give more
> > flexibility to effect both research and changework.
> >
>
>A reasonable question to which the answer is that the OTHER way
>has been done to death for the last 12,000 years - indeed, WE ARE
>THE RESULTS of this!!! - and I'm specifically looking for
>something *better* in every way.

I disagree what has been done for the last 12,000 years is T-M System ->
energy body. Not <->, without it you are eliminating communication. -> is
preaching, lecturing, telling, lording it over. <-> is communication,
equality, a part of oneness. (Just my POV, but something to really consider.)

We don't want to make the same mistake in the other direction. For 12,000
years the T-M system (consciousness) has talked in a demanding way to both
the energy system and the unconscious with out communicating (two-way
dialog). Do we have to go another 12,000 years in the other direction
before we include both?

H

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

           
Received on Thu May 29 2003 - 17:28:37 BST