> Of course, the Tahitians had nothing much to do besides
> sit on beaches
> with their lovers, only drinking Kava instead of cocktails!
>
>
> Nicholas
<snigger>
Hi Nicholas (and all)
the reason that I've been talking about this at all was ONLY and
SPECIFICALLY to have people, individually, have a little sniff and
dig around for what enlightenment means to them and, should they
find that they have doubts and fears, to DEAL WITH THEM NOW
because that is becoming rather important in the greater scheme of
things.
Before right now today, if someone had doubts, that was it.
Clearly, they were thus "not amongst the chosen ones".
But WE can do EFT. We can do ET. We can do all sorts which they
never could, couldn't even talk or think about, and most people
who are in the enlightenment game never even suspect that they
have a lifetime's worth of personal and then a few thousand
lifetime's worth of hereditary entrainment AWAY FROM
enlightenment.
The "chop wood" demotivator which all by itself will well filter
out at least 15% of the general population (!) is just the very
tip of the iceberg.
So this discussion I initiated was not about what enlightenment is
or isnt, because of course we can't know.
It's about what each person *thinks* it is or much more
importantly, how they *feel* about that.
*WHATEVER* you may think it is, is it motivational? Highly
motivational? Essential?
That's a question each person has to sort out for themselves even
if they have never consciously considered it before.
How does "enlightenment" tie in with all the other things you
always wanted, WHATEVER they might have been, for YOU?
Do you consider getting actively involved in this process
possible, useful, achievable, desirable, inevitable, irrelevant?
That's all I wanted to say, really.
SF
------------------
Received on Sat Apr 19 2003 - 07:16:00 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT