Dear Anti-Christ

At 08:22 PM 5/29/2003 -0500, Silvia wrote:

>>Yes. Absolutely. I wasn't going to admit to it in public, but I am
>>in fact the coming of the Anti-Christ, and I am here to make sure
>>that the next 12,000 years are going to be *exactly* as fucked up
>>and useless as the last 12,000 were!
>>
>>Read the Thought Flow series on Sidereus. Especially the one
>>called, The Totality.
>>Then lets talk.

Dear Anti-Christ (Silvia),

I reread the Thought Flow series including The Totality. (It sure is funny
how when I read what you wrote I think it is saying the same thing I was/am
saying and yet I thought you wanted me to read it to understand your POV
which you indicate is different.)

Oh the ambiguity of words, you gotta love'em.

Help me out here. If I misunderstand correctly your premise is that we need
to treat the totality (soul/energy/T-M/physical[mind-body-soul-energy]
whatever) with respect? or equally?... Which one?

If I'm missunderstanding correctly you have determined a model/order or
hierarchy, right? Is it totality = soul system ->energy system -> T-M
system -> physical system or is it soul system ->energy system -> physical
system -> T-M system?

The -> indicates the direction of influence.

While I may be off or missing the mark here (that would mean I'm sinning) I
think this is close to what you had in mind based on adding the Thought
Flow series with what you wrote before.

While I prefer a more holographic model where in the totality all the
systems are connected to and influence each other and can communicate in
all directions at the same time, it seems to me from your previous email on
the subject you have the influence only going one way ->.

I think you have mentioned and/or indicated that the higher system can get
feedback from the lower system but are not able to initiate change in a
higher system, in other words it can't influence up the chain except by
feedback and it can influence down the chain without feedback. Is this close.

And based on your concept of "saving the totality" wouldn't totality be
better served if both influence and feedback were able to be communicated
<-> both ways. (That seems more ecological to me, but I could be missing
something here)

I think, and it's just me, that saying the influence is only one
directional, except in the form of feedback is limiting the Totality.

I have other thoughts and questions on different aspects of the Totality
and the Totality itself but those take the brainstorming session in another
direction, so I'll save them for later.

Need Nothing, Desire Everything, Choose What Shows Up,
Enjoy Life-It's ALL Information, Utilize It ALL,
Doc

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

           
Received on Thu 29 May 2003 - 22:08:45 BST