Re: [ET2] ET and Eastern thought

From: SFX <sfx_at_W7py3fWVuZ-KFwBiI0NJPns9Xt6uRF4W-_hiP4xgk2RG8lDayXBEiENv0ZjvOQMJzdWy7PV7o6z>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 00:07:09 +0100

>>It is fun to find such similarities in a current-day technique and
a thousands-of-years-old process.<<

It is my assertion that there is only one reality, the real reality, and if we describe this adequately, we are correct and it doesn't get any correcter than that.

Over the millennia, numerous people have spotted the relationships between energetics and behaviour and drawn conclusions on how the universe works; if it is correct, then you'll find it re-occurring time and time again. Reality just won't go away.

Which is good, really :-)

It gives me hope ... :-)

<<You might be interested in this: I did a spell-check and the
alternative it came up with for EmoTrance was Importance.>>

That's fun!

Before Google recognised EmoTrance as a word in its own right, it used to offer the suggestion, "Did you mean ...

ENTRANCE

...?"

How sweet a word - en-trance.

LOL

SFX

           
Received on Fri May 02 2008 - 16:07:46 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT