Re: [ET2] censorship

Eolake Stobblehouse wrote:
>
>
> Here is an interesting article about censorship:
> http://www.cinebizarre.com/essay_eroticphil.htm
> <http://www.cinebizarre.com/essay_eroticphil.htm>
>
> ... I have been thinking a lot in recent years of the forces that
> drive censorship. And I think that what it basically comes down to is
> that there are two kinds of people: those who divide people into two
> categories, and those who don't. Uh, I mean: there are people who
> want to STOP energy, and there are people who want energy to flow.
> The first kind loves rules, and censorship, and war, and hate sex.
> And vice versa.
>
> Yours, Eolake

This is true.

Still, in ET theory, rejecting an energy usually means that behind the shield, there's an injury which would really hurt if that energy was let in.

Fundamentalists and the anally retentive tend to have been brought up in very damaging circumstances and they have a lot of injuries. One touches that ever so slightly and they can't help but freak out.

It's a sad thing.

I guess love (unconditional attention) could cure it but unfortunately, those people who need it the most get the least of it because they are already so unattractive (energetic lepers!) and so shielded on top of it. When they're not freaking out, that is, which makes them even more unattractive, less lovable and that leads to even more of the same. A vicious downward spiral into extremism.

Which is culturally encouraged for control purposes.

Hopefully, as the new energy psychologies filter through the population and start to impact the world, we'll see some interesting changes.

Que sera, sera ...

SFX

           
Received on Mon Jun 26 2006 - 14:53:12 BST