Anybody knows where I can get some of Virgini's videos?
Thanks!
Magickman
--- In emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com, "StarFields" <starfields_at_b...>
wrote:
> First of all, a very hearty welcome to all serious NLPers - and to
> all funny ones, also.
>
> Any ET practitioners wanting to widen their horizons, by all means
> take a training. Hypnosis especially is one of these wonderful
> loopholes in human construct city that may prove to be a suitable
> escape hatch if correctly enchanted :-))
>
> What is important for me to have clear to all NLPers is that what
> we are doing here with ET is much, much more related to the silent
> 3rd in the NLP genesis - namely VIRGINIA SATIR.
>
> Being the lady in the pack, as well as the furthest from "rational
> scientific explanation", she received the least attention but she
> was the one who was working with energy and where the submodality
> stuff comes from, which lead to the eye accessing cues and not the
> other way around.
>
> When I said, "she received the least attention" I do NOT mean by
> Bandler and co, but since by those trying to figure out where
> Bandler got his stuff from.
>
> This is the missing loop and explanation as to what he does, how
> he does it and even why.
>
> If you want to get right on the map with this stuff from an NLP
> standpoint and connect the missing dots in your energy/NLP
> landscape, you have to turn to Virginia Satir as the original
> inspiration and teacher and watch her videos, read her books.
>
> When you do you will look at it with your mouth open and ask
> yourself why no-one else has written the EmoTrance book in all
> these years, its so blatantly obvious!
>
> Also, and this is a very important and interesting point, Virginia
> was working with multi-ordinate systemics - not with a single
> system of one human construct but groups of them. The kind of
> logic and reading skills needed here are of course of such an
> order that standard scientific notation is no longer applicable
> and although you can perfectly *see* what she's doing and
> perfectly understand it as well, go and present your
> understandings to a bunch of dour scientists at some university
> and see how far you get with it.
>
> I think this is why this was put aside and focus paid to the more
> simpler, easier to "re-scientalise" topics for all this time.
>
> Luckily, I only deal with people so I don't have that problem or
> limitation :-) plus by then having the authority of the new energy
> psychology set behind me, it was easy to do when 20 years ago,
> clearly it was not.
>
> Anyway.
>
> If you want to do historic research, dig out Virginia and just
> watch, learn and listen :-)
>
> waves,
>
> SF
Received on Mon Jun 09 2003 - 07:44:48 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT