This reminds me of something from A Course in Miracles which I was just reading again this morning.
The first principle of a miracle says -
There is no order of difficulty in miracles. One is not harder or bigger than another. They are all the same. All expressions of love are maximal.
This seems to match what you are saying, Silvia, and I think it is extremely important to keep it in our consciousness. What we are doing is releasing illusions as the Course talks of with miracles. And there is no order of magnitude in this - as the Course also says.
I have much more to write about an ET experience I had last week involving past sexual incidents but I have no time now. Will get to it later. Just wanted to say that about ACIM.
I also have an update re Adam, Silvia, which I will post to PS group later.
Love to all - especially the sisterhood in our wanderings through this sexual/emotional maelstrom
Linda
----- Original Message -----
From: StarFields
To: emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 4:48 PM
Subject: [ET2] Damage
With the recent topics, and especially the always central focus
"child abuse", I'd like to make a public statement about damage.
I wrote a longish mail in response to Shazadi which not all of you
might have read, but it's important to re-iterate one point here,
namely that of giving up on hierarchical thinking when one works
with energy systems. SYSTEMS are not hierarchical in nature.
There are NO brownie points therefore for either having been
abused as a child or not, nor how often or how severely, in energy
healing.
The sentence of, "Oh don't make such a fuss, other people are much
worse off than you!" (or indeed the inverse, "Every workshop I go
to I am the center of attention because my pain is so much worse
than everyone elses!") likewise, is nonsensical.
I wanted each and every one of you (and all your alters, aspects,
parts and attachments who might be listening also!) to really know
and understand that we're here strictly in the business of
restoring Even Flow.
Whatever that means for an individual. Whatever it pertains to.
However it came into being. However "big" or "small" no longer
sets any form of merit nor even if its all in your mind or not -
it is all just an energy and all equally deserving of our
undivided and focussed attention.
Just thought I would make that absolutely crystal.
SF
========================
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emotrance2-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Tue May 27 2003 - 03:21:47 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:02:32 GMT