Re: [ET2] ET & Releasing (Sedona Method)

Hi maarten and everyone
I have to agree with maaarten on that some of ET technologi has been presented before . In fact in the water tradition in Taoist meditaton almost identical methods has been used for more than 2000 years.A few differenses though, one being that every blockage is dissolved by the mind only,and that emphasis is to release the energy out beyond the etheric body. At later stages
the energy is released inward to inner space which is said to be as big as the whole universe(black hole?) However ET`s excellent approches-assisting and softening with hands/ghost hands and angles to dealing with problems is extremely effective
and has helped speeding up progression. And a lot easier to learn.
Thank you Silvia

----- Original Message -----
  From: maalberse
  To: emotrance2_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:23 AM
  Subject: Tr: [ET2] ET & Releasing (Sedona Method)

  <<I have thought about this because people will keep saying ET is like this or that.>>

  Maybe I will be lynched for this, but I have to say that to a large extent some of this is right, in a way. Closed-mindedness (and competiveness) probably plays a role, frequently. But I believe that these comments cannot be reduced to just narrowmindedness.

  I have been very intensely involved with a wide range of energy-and-movement based methods for some thirty years, so I do believe I can say something about this.
  Almost all elements of ET have been mentioned and practiced here and there. Really.

  What I say to people, when they mention the similarities:
  1) For me, ET is to the other energy-methods bundled together, what early NLP was to gestalt-therapy. I really believe this is a fair comparison.

  It is also a real compliment to Silvia. For me, as a gestalt (and biodynamic) therapist at the time, the "Structure of Magic" did a great job in cutting out the crap and wonderfully organizing the treasures that, in a poorly organized way, *already existed*.
  And I feel Silvia has done the same, in the energy-field.

  2) The major difference between ET and (almost?) all other energy-sytems, - and a HUGE one!- is that ET doesn't work with a prefabricated map. I agree that assuming that maps, coming from very different cultures, can't be assumed to be appropriate for us, in our times.

  For creating a model that frees us from limiting maps (and what a liberation that is!), I take my hat off for Silvia, and possibly so for the rest of my life.

  The main reason why I bring this up: *not* to be polemical, but simply because I have found that highlighting the differences and obscuring the similarities is counter-productive.
  I believe that, if ET is to find a wider recognition, both similarities and differences need to be honored.
  At least, that's what I have found to work best in order to really get the interest of people who know something about energy-work. It's also more honest, IMO.

  I post this out of love for ET, and from my desire that it spreads far and wide.

  Maarten

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  emotrance2-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

           
Received on Thu Feb 13 2003 - 12:20:16 GMT