RE: [ET2] ET & Releasing (Sedona Method)

In addition, the energised end state achieved using ET is absolutely unique.

I have not come across or experienced this using any other of the so called
releasing methods.

Nicola

>I have thought about this because people will keep saying ET is
>like this or that. EFT has suffered from this too, close minded
>folk going, oh yeah it's just a pattern interrupt, oh yeah its
>just a bit of hypnosis. Yeah right ... Just try and do what EFT
>can do with a pattern interrupt, and just try and do what ET can
>do with Sedona, or with Focussing, or with (etc. etc. etc.) and
>SPOT THE DIFFERENCE.
>
>Here is the core difference.
>
>Sedona tells you to "release" stuff - but it doesn't tell you how.
>
>Lots of systems tell you to release energy - but they don't tell
>you how.
>
>Lots of systems tell you to move energy - but they don't tell you
>how you are supposed to do that.
>
>Lots and lots and LOTS of systems tell you to say "yes" and get a
>forward movement - but they don't tell you how to spot and clear
>reversals and blockages to this forward movement.
>
>Lots of techniques try and get you to forgive, or bring in the
>light or this and that - but none of them train you first how to
>run and channel energy CLEANLY which is the prerequisite to all of
>that.
>
>What they are missing are two things.
>
>One is the clear understanding that we are NOT releasing "anger" -
>what is that supposed to be? How are you supposed to release
>"anger"?
>
>We are not dealing with "frogs of confusion" or "big black pitted
>swords" or any such form of thoughtfield interface device which
>distorts and confuses the issue.
>
>We are dealing strictly with the energy body and its natural
>pathways - wherever they may be in any one given individual.
>
>We are NOT presupposing that we know where the channels are but
>learning instead.

>We are guided by physiological feedback in EmoTrance, not by
>hallucinations.
>
>We are working systemically and only with direct feedback at all
>times.
>
>The second major difference is that of what the whole thing is
>actually for.
>
>EmoTrance is not remedial by nature but proactive and
>constructive. It is NOT for getting rid of a depression or anger,
>but to learn to access new states which hold different cognition
>and different experiences and indeed, to use the energy body as it
>was designed to be used in the context of the overall totality.
>
>Hope that makes things bright and sparkly clear,
>
>SF

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

           
Received on Sat Feb 01 2003 - 06:13:32 GMT